tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11380429.post557439068384712172..comments2023-03-29T07:33:35.853-07:00Comments on Great Blogs of Fire: The Beauty of E=mc2Kylehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14459912711528974289noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11380429.post-16011797214860257482012-01-14T21:57:33.882-08:002012-01-14T21:57:33.882-08:00Kyle,
Thanks for the post. There is an old adage...Kyle,<br /><br />Thanks for the post. There is an old adage from Dostoevsky's, The Idiot that "beauty will save the world." As a Christian one believes that Jesus Christ, Our Lord and Savior defines beauty, just as He defines truth and goodness (the transcendentals, with unity as the fourth). For the last five years I have been hoping that others would see the light of truth concerning E=mc^2 and its relationship to Christ (through whom all things were made). My blog at http://eucharist-emc2.blogspot.com is dedicated to this purpose. It is no mere coincidence that the Church has designated the Institution of the Holy Eucharist at the Last Supper as the fifth Mystery of Light.<br /><br />God Bless YouMike Rizziohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14263900468617294226noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11380429.post-2594603427681094932012-01-14T21:41:29.762-08:002012-01-14T21:41:29.762-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Mike Rizziohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14263900468617294226noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11380429.post-17001424288544520332012-01-04T12:06:29.254-08:002012-01-04T12:06:29.254-08:00I'm probably wrong, but the speed of light par...I'm probably wrong, but the speed of light part wasn't really explains by Tyson, so I did a quick Wikipedia search and briefly scanned the c part. Journalistic integrity anyone?Kylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14459912711528974289noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11380429.post-47180916205295567822012-01-03T06:15:05.274-08:002012-01-03T06:15:05.274-08:00Kyle,
While I'm not a physicist, I pretty sur...Kyle,<br /><br />While I'm not a physicist, I pretty sure you're interpretation of e=mc^2 is off. It doesn't say that at c (the speed of light) squared, an object becomes energy. It means that the theoretical amount of energy available from a given mass (m) if converted entirely into energy would be measured by mass x c (speed of light)^2.<br /><br />That doesn't take away from your point, I don't think. Just thought you'd like to have the scientific/mathematics piece more correct.<br /><br />DwayneDwayne Baileyhttp://dwayne.thebaileys.namenoreply@blogger.com